The trial took place in the blisteringly hot month of July 1925, at the Rhea County Courthouse in Dayton. Thousands of visitors, including journalists and prominent academics, poured into the small town to see the clash of evolutionism versus creationism, rural fundamentalism versus worldly urban sophistication.
Darrow and his colleagues on the defense team made no attempt to maintain their client’s innocence of the charges against him, but argued that the Butler Act itself was unconstitutional. As a result, Scopes’ particular situation gave way to a larger debate over the validity of Darwin’s theory versus the authority of the Bible.
The drama reached its peak on the seventh day of the trial. The courtroom had grown so packed, and the heat so intense, that Judge John T. Raulston ordered that the trial proceedings be moved outside. As the judge had prohibited the defense from calling any scientific witnesses, Darrow took the highly unusual step of calling Bryan himself onto the stand as an expert on the Bible.
Under cross-examination, Darrow got his opponent to admit that creation was not completed in a week, but “might have continued for millions of years”—in effect, that not all of the Bible’s teachings should be taken literally—considered a major triumph for the defense.
The lawyers’ heated exchange might have continued, as Bryan wanted to put Darrow on the stand the following day, but Judge Raulston put a halt to that and declared Darrow’s cross-examination irrelevant to the case. Darrow responded by asking the jury to find his client guilty, so they could move on and appeal the verdict to a higher court. The jury did so, finding Scopes guilty of violating the Butler Act and fining him $100.