The 1968 U.S. Open marked a departure that would revolutionize the game of competitive tennis over the next half century. Following the example of England and France earlier in the year, the United States Lawn Tennis Association (USLTA) abandoned its 87-year-old amateurs-only tradition, helping to usher in an age of professionalization, commercialization and media exposure that turned touring tennis pros into celebrities.
None of this was assured at the outset of the Open era, when many observers questioned the viability of melding the amateur and professional tours. As play began at the first U. S. Open, virtually everyone expected the pros—who occupied the top four seeds—to dominate the tournament. Even Arthur Ashe, the highest seeded amateur at #5, was thought to have little chance of surviving past the quarterfinals.
Ashe was coming off an impressive victory at the National Amateur tournament held in Boston the week before the Open. The top-ranked amateur in the nation, he had amassed a considerable record of achievement during nearly a decade of play, capturing four national amateur singles titles, leading UCLA to the 1965 NCAA team championship while winning both the singles and doubles titles, and excelling as a member of the U.S. Davis Cup squad.
Not that it was as easy as he made it look. A racial pioneer who had risen above the Jim Crow restrictions of his Virginia boyhood, Ashe gained national attention as the first Black man to reach the highest echelon of amateur tennis. Of the 128 players in the men’s draw at the first U.S. Open, he was the lone African American—in his words, as “noticeable as the only raisin in a rice pudding.” Barred from playing against whites in his hometown of Richmond until 1966, he continued to face racial discrimination at many private tennis clubs, especially in the South. “Get the n***** off the court,” one white patron screamed in March 1969 while he was practicing at a country club in St. Petersburg, Florida.
Arthur Ashe Slices Through the Pros
Ashe was known for his great backhand, his hammering serve, a calm and gracious demeanor and an almost unparalleled commitment to sportsmanship. But these assets didn’t initially appear to be enough to overcome the experience and talent of the best pros at the Open. He had never beaten the #1 seed, the great Australian Rod Laver, losing to him most recently in the 1968 Wimbledon semifinals. And even if Laver somehow faltered in the early rounds, the young amateur still had the other Aussie pros—Ken Rosewall, John Newcombe, Tony Roche and Roy Emerson—to contend with. Also lurking in the draw was his boyhood idol, the legendary champion Pancho Gonzales, attempting a comeback at age 40.
To reach the finals, Ashe would not only have to play well; he would also need an upset or two to help clear his path to the top. This scenario seemed highly improbable as the tournament began, but when a string of upsets materialized—starting with Laver, Roche and Emerson in the fourth round—Ashe sensed fate had somehow intervened. When Newcombe and Gonzales were upended in the quarterfinals, only Rosewall and the fleet-footed Dutchman Tom Okker remained.
In the semifinals, Okker eliminated Rosewall, while Ashe upended his Davis Cup teammate Clark Graebner, the #7 seed, in four tough sets. The match, one of the most famous of Ashe’s career, was immortalized by the journalist John McPhee in a remarkable series of New Yorker articles later published in book form as Levels of the Game. A masterpiece of close analysis, the book would add color, literally and figuratively, to the historic aura surrounding the first U.S. Open.
Emphasizing the stark contrast between the two players—one Black, Southern and quietly determined to make his mark; the other white, Midwestern and seemingly self-satisfied with his upper-middle-class life—McPhee noted that even their equipment clashed. Graebner used a Wilson T-2000 metal racket, introduced to the tour the previous year, while Ashe still relied on a traditional wood-frame racket. As amateurs they were removed from the high-stakes commercialism that was revolutionizing the tennis world, but their primal semifinal contest made good copy and good television.