Skip to main content

History Stories

The National Archives just released more than 2,800 previously classified records relating to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, sparking a feeding frenzy among historians and conspiracy theorists alike.

Click HERE for our most recent story on what the documents contain.

As CNN has reported, among the earliest revelations to emerge from the newly released files were CIA notes on an intercepted telephone call on September 28, 1963, from Lee Harvey Oswald to a KGB agent in Mexico City, and evidence that the FBI’s Dallas office received a threat on Oswald’s life on November 23, 1963, the night before Jack Ruby shot him, from a man saying he was a “member of a committee organized to kill Oswald.”

The records were made public under the 1992 John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act, which mandated that all material housed at the National Archives about the assassination be made public by October 26, 2017, which is the 25th anniversary of the act. Butlast-minute concerns by U.S. national security and intelligence agencies led President Donald Trump to block the release of thousands of the remaining files just hours before the deadline.

The bulk of the massive collection has been available to the public—either in full or redacted form—already. But tens of thousands of documents had remained classified, presumably because they contained highly sensitive information that the CIA, FBI or other agencies thought might damage national security.

What’s in the Newly Declassified JFK Assassination Documents?

Part of a file, dated April 5, 1964, details efforts to trace Lee Harvey Oswald's travel from Mexico City back to the United States.

Part of a file, dated April 5, 1964, details efforts to trace Lee Harvey Oswald’s travel from Mexico City back to the United States. 

1) Of the documents that were originally set to be released, some 3,100 had never been seen by the public before. Though few experts expected the final batch of files to offer up a “smoking gun” proving Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone in killing Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963, the last batch of files were expected to provide more insight into exactly how much U.S. national security agencies knew about Oswald before the assassination, and how much information the CIA and FBI withheld from the official investigation into the assassination, which concluded in 1964.

2) Many of the most anticipated remaining files relate to a trip Oswald took to Mexico City in September 1963, just two months before he shot Kennedy. During his visit, Oswald went to the Cuban embassy and met with officials in his attempt to get a visa to travel to Cuba, and then on to the Soviet Union.

3) Many of the files originally set for release reportedly come from the CIA office in Mexico City, and may reveal whether U.S. operatives there knew of Oswald’s plan to kill Kennedy (which he reportedly talked openly about during his trip) and how much they may have withheld from CIA headquarters in Washington.

VIDEO: James Leavelle, Witness to History – Former Texas homicide detective James Leavelle gives a first-hand account of JFK’s assassination.

What the Experts Say

Gerald Posner, an expert on the Kennedy assassination and author of the book Cold Case, speculated that the revelations contained in the latest batch of files might prove embarrassing to some prominent figures: “There may be people who were informing to the CIA at the time who have moved on to careers in politics and business, and the revelation that they were informing will be embarrassing to them.”

Posner also believes the files may contain intriguing items unrelated to the assassination, including a handwritten letter from Jackie Kennedy about her husband’s funeral and a previously classified letter from J. Edgar Hoover.

Scroll to Continue

Recommended for you

Philip Shenon, author of A Cruel and Shocking Act: The Secret History of the Kennedy Assassinationwrote in Politico that the new batch of files also contains a transcript of a 1976 interview by congressional investigators of James Jesus Angleton, director of counterintelligence for the CIA in 1963 and the main conduit of information between the agency and the Warren Commission, which investigated the assassination.

Lee Harvey Oswald distributes Hands Off Cuba flyers on the streets of New Orleans, Louisiana. This photograph was used in the Kennedy assassination investigation.

Lee Harvey Oswald distributes Hands Off Cuba flyers on the streets of New Orleans, Louisiana. This photograph was used in the Kennedy assassination investigation. 

Will These Declassified Documents Fuel More Conspiracy Theories? 

Despite the commission’s official conclusion in 1964 that Oswald acted alone in killing Kennedy, many people have held fast to the belief that more than one person had to be involved. (It certainly didn’t help that Oswald never stood trial for the crime, having been shot to death by Jack Ruby two days after Kennedy’s assassination.)

Speculation about Oswald’s activities on his Mexico trip have long fueled one of the most popular JFK-related conspiracy theories, which argues that Cuban dictator Fidel Castro plotted to assassinate Kennedy as revenge for the Bay of Pigs invasion. In the 1970s, revelations that the Kennedy administration made various attempts to assassinate Castro fueled the idea that Castro acted first against Kennedy.

In addition to Castro, potential conspirators have included the CIA, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, the Mafia, the KGB or some malicious combination thereof. The success of Oliver Stone’s film “JFK,” which suggested a vast government conspiracy was behind the assassination, helped motivate the U.S. Congress to enact the Records Collection Act in 1992. By its terms, all material related to the assassination would be housed in a single collection at the National Archives.

The interior of the Presidential limousine after the Kennedy assassination

The interior of the Presidential limousine after the Kennedy assassination

How Many Files About JFK’s Assassination Have Been Declassified? 

Of the total library of files—which encompasses some 5 million pages—88 percent has been open and available to the public since the late 1990s, according to the National Archives. An additional 11 percent had been released in redacted form, with sensitive portions excised.

As the October 2017 deadline approached, the Archives released a batch of material in July, including a total of 3,810 documents. Some 441 had been withheld in full until that point, and 3,369 previously released in redacted form. Among the released information were 17 audio files of interviews conducted with a KGB officer, Yuri Nosenko. Nosenko, who defected to the United States in early 1964, claimed to have been in charge of a file the KGB kept on Oswald during the time he lived in the Soviet Union (1959-62).

The 1992 law specified that only the president of the United States could choose to block the release of the remaining records past the October deadline. On October 21, President Trump announced via Twitter that he planned to allow their release, reportedly against the advice of some national security agencies. The day before the release, he teased the “long-anticipated” release of the JFK files on Twitter again, calling it “So interesting!”

But as the end of the deadline day approached, President Trump issued a memo stating that while he ordered  “that the veil of history finally be lifted,” he would block the release of some of the remaining JFK files pending an additional six months of review. Trump’s decision came after U.S. intelligence and national security agencies made last-minute recommendations that certain material be redacted. “I have no choice—today—but to accept those redactions rather than allow potentially irreversible harm to our Nation’s security,” the memo read.  

Instead of the full cache of remaining files, the National Archives posted 2,891 records online on the evening of October 26. In accordance with President Trump’s order, the Archives said it would process the additional records (subject to the recommended redactions) for release on a rolling basis going forward.

FACT CHECK: We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! HISTORY reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate.